ButtonAI logoButtonAI
Back to Blog

The End of 'Easy to Sign Up, Hard to Cancel'? What the Adobe Lawsuit Means for SaaS Marketers.

Published on October 2, 2025

The End of 'Easy to Sign Up, Hard to Cancel'? What the Adobe Lawsuit Means for SaaS Marketers.

The End of 'Easy to Sign Up, Hard to Cancel'? What the Adobe Lawsuit Means for SaaS Marketers.

For years, a common mantra in the subscription economy has been 'make it easy to sign up, and hard to cancel.' This strategy, designed to capture customers quickly and reduce churn through friction, has long been a subject of ethical debate. Now, it's firmly in the legal crosshairs. The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has filed a significant lawsuit against Adobe, accusing the software giant of trapping consumers in subscriptions through hidden fees and convoluted cancellation processes. This isn't just a headline about a tech behemoth; it's a seismic event for the entire Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) industry.

If your marketing or growth strategy relies on any form of 'negative option marketing' or a cancellation process that feels more like an escape room than a customer service interaction, this is your official wake-up call. The Adobe lawsuit signals a new era of enforcement, where consumer protection, transparency, and user experience are no longer just best practices—they are legal imperatives. In this comprehensive guide, we'll break down what the lawsuit entails, unpack the deceptive 'dark patterns' under scrutiny, and provide an actionable checklist to ensure your SaaS business is not only compliant but also building a sustainable, trust-based relationship with its customers.

What Happened? A Quick Breakdown of the FTC's Lawsuit Against Adobe

On June 17, 2024, the U.S. Department of Justice, upon notification and referral from the FTC, filed a complaint against Adobe Inc. and two of its executives. The lawsuit alleges that Adobe violated federal laws, specifically the Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act (ROSCA), by systematically hiding important subscription terms in the fine print and ambushing consumers with a hefty early termination fee when they tried to cancel.

The Core Allegations: Hidden Fees and Complicated Cancellations

The FTC's complaint zeroes in on Adobe's popular 'annual, paid monthly' subscription plan. According to the lawsuit, Adobe pushed this plan without clearly disclosing that it was a year-long commitment. When customers tried to cancel, they were hit with a surprise: an early termination fee (ETF) that could amount to hundreds of dollars.

The allegations can be summarized into two main points:

  • Lack of Transparency: The FTC claims Adobe failed to 'clearly and conspicuously' disclose the terms of the annual commitment and the associated ETF. Key details were allegedly buried in fine print or behind optional tooltips and hyperlinks, a practice regulators consider deceptive. This is a direct challenge to what is known as 'negative option marketing,' where a seller interprets a customer's silence or failure to take an affirmative action as consent to be charged.
  • Obstruction of Cancellation: The lawsuit also highlights the deliberately complex and difficult process for cancellation. Customers who wanted to end their subscriptions were reportedly forced through a labyrinthine series of web pages, dropped calls, and transferred chats, all while Adobe resisted their attempts. This practice of creating excessive friction to retain a customer is a classic example of a 'dark pattern.'

Why This Lawsuit is a Wake-Up Call for the SaaS Industry

The action against Adobe isn't an isolated event. It's the culmination of a broader FTC crackdown on deceptive subscription models. The commission has been vocal about its intent to enforce laws like ROSCA and has proposed a 'click to cancel' provision, which would mandate that businesses make it as easy for consumers to cancel a subscription as it was to sign up for it. This subscription model lawsuit against a high-profile company like Adobe is a clear signal to the entire SaaS world: the grace period is over. The FTC is actively seeking to penalize companies that prioritize short-term revenue retention over clear, ethical communication and a positive SaaS user experience.

Unpacking 'Dark Patterns': The Deceptive Tactics Under Scrutiny

The term 'dark patterns' is central to the FTC's case and a critical concept for every SaaS marketer to understand. Coined by UX specialist Harry Brignull, dark patterns are user interface design choices that trick or manipulate users into making decisions they wouldn't otherwise make, often against their best interests. The 'easy to sign up, hard to cancel' model is rife with them.

Common Examples in SaaS Sign-ups and Cancellations

While the Adobe lawsuit focuses on specific tactics, many dark patterns have become alarmingly common in the SaaS landscape. Auditing your own flows for these can be a crucial first step toward compliance and better customer relationships.

  • Roach Motel: This is the essence of the FTC's complaint. It's incredibly easy to get into a situation (sign up for a trial or subscription) but disproportionately difficult to get out of it (cancel).
  • Forced Continuity: A user signs up for a 'free trial' that automatically converts into a paid subscription without clear, prominent reminders or an easy opt-out mechanism.
  • Hidden Costs: Like the alleged Adobe subscription cancellation fee, this involves surprising users with undisclosed charges, fees, or long-term commitments only after they are already invested.
  • Confirmshaming: Using guilt-tripping language to dissuade users from canceling. For example, a button that says 'No, I don't want to improve my productivity' instead of a simple 'Continue without subscribing.'
  • Misdirection: Using visual cues, like a brightly colored 'Upgrade' button next to a muted, gray 'Cancel' link, to steer users away from their intended action.

The Impact on Customer Trust and Brand Reputation

While dark patterns might artificially inflate short-term metrics like user count and initial revenue, they are devastating in the long run. They erode the single most important asset a company has: customer trust. A user who feels tricked into a subscription is not a loyal customer. They are a detractor waiting to happen. They will churn at the first possible opportunity, complain loudly on social media, and leave negative reviews. In an era where brand reputation is paramount, the long-term cost of deceptive practices far outweighs any fleeting gains. Prioritizing ethical subscription design isn't just about avoiding an FTC dark patterns lawsuit; it's about building a sustainable business on a foundation of respect for your customers.

Key Implications and Takeaways for SaaS Marketers

The legal and reputational risks are clear. Now, let's translate the lessons from the Adobe lawsuit into concrete strategies for SaaS marketing compliance and sustainable growth. This isn't about gutting your retention efforts; it's about re-focusing them on value rather than obstruction.

Takeaway 1: Transparency in Pricing and Terms is Non-Negotiable

The days of hiding critical terms in a 20-page document are over. The FTC's interpretation of ROSCA demands that all material terms—including pricing, commitment length, and cancellation policies—are presented 'clearly and conspicuously.'

What this means for you:

  • Upfront Disclosure: Clearly state the total cost of any commitment on the primary sign-up page. If it's an annual plan paid monthly, explicitly state 'This is a 12-month contract' next to the price.
  • No More Fine Print: Don't rely on hyperlinks or tiny footnotes for essential information. Use plain language and place critical terms where a user cannot possibly miss them before entering their payment details.
  • Obtain Affirmative Consent: Use an unticked checkbox that a user must actively click to confirm they have read and understood the key terms of the subscription before they can complete the purchase.

Takeaway 2: The 'Click to Cancel' Standard is Coming

While the FTC's proposed 'click to cancel' rule is not yet final law, the Adobe lawsuit shows that regulators are already enforcing its spirit. The principle is simple: if a customer can sign up online, they must be able to cancel online in the same number of steps. Forcing users to call a support line, navigate complex menus, or speak to a retention specialist to cancel a service they bought online is no longer a defensible practice.

What this means for you:

  • Self-Service Cancellation: Your product must have an easy-to-find, fully online cancellation path within the user's account settings.
  • Mirror the Sign-up: The cancellation process should be as straightforward and friction-free as your sign-up process. Avoid adding unnecessary steps, surveys, or retention pitches that block the user from their goal.
  • Immediate Confirmation: Once a user cancels, they should receive immediate confirmation on-screen and via email, providing peace of mind and documenting the transaction.

Takeaway 3: Retention Efforts Must Shift from Obstruction to Value

This is perhaps the most important strategic shift. For too long, some companies have conflated 'retention' with 'making it hard to leave.' True retention, however, is about making customers *want* to stay. This is the core of effective customer retention strategies in SaaS.

What this means for you:

  • Focus on Proactive Value: Instead of fighting cancellation, invest in onboarding, customer success, and continuous product improvement to demonstrate undeniable value from day one. When a customer sees the ROI, cancellation is less likely.
  • Use Ethical Off-boarding: A cancellation flow isn't a battle; it's a crucial feedback opportunity. Instead of blocking the exit, use the moment to understand *why* the customer is leaving and offer value-aligned alternatives.
  • Learn from Churn: Every cancellation is a data point. Analyze churn reasons to identify product gaps, pricing issues, or service failures. Use this insight to improve your offering for everyone else, which is the ultimate strategy for reducing customer churn.

Actionable Checklist: How to Audit and Future-Proof Your Subscription Model

Feeling overwhelmed? Don't be. Use this checklist to conduct a proactive audit of your subscription process and align it with the new standards of transparency and user experience.

Review Your Sign-up Flow for Clarity

  • Pricing Page: Is every plan's commitment period (monthly vs. annual) and billing cycle clearly stated? Is the total contract value for annual plans displayed?
  • Checkout Process: Are all terms, including renewal policies and cancellation fees (if any), presented next to the 'Confirm Purchase' button?
  • Consent: Are you using a mandatory, unticked checkbox for users to agree to your terms before they pay?
  • Welcome Email: Does the post-purchase confirmation email reiterate the key terms of the subscription and provide a link to instructions on how to manage it?

Simplify Your Cancellation Process

  • Accessibility: Can a user find the 'Cancel Subscription' option within two or three clicks from their main account dashboard?
  • Method: Is the cancellation process 100% self-serve and online? Or are you forcing users to make a phone call or chat with an agent?
  • Simplicity: How many steps does it take? If it's more than the sign-up process, you have a problem. Remove any unnecessary steps immediately.
  • Confirmation: Is cancellation effective immediately (or at the end of the current billing period), with clear on-screen and email confirmations?

Offer Ethical Off-boarding Alternatives (Pausing, Downgrades)

  • Provide Options: During the cancellation flow, do you offer helpful alternatives like pausing the subscription for a few months or downgrading to a lower-tier or free plan?
  • Make them Optional: Ensure these offers are presented as optional alternatives, not as mandatory hurdles. The user must always have a clear path to 'Continue to Cancel.'
  • Gather Feedback: Use a simple, one-question (optional) survey to ask why the user is leaving. Frame it as a way to help you improve, not as a barrier to their exit.

Turning Compliance into a Competitive Advantage

The FTC's lawsuit against Adobe should not be viewed as a burden on SaaS businesses. Instead, it's an opportunity to build a better, more sustainable company. In a crowded market, trust is the ultimate differentiator. Companies that embrace transparency, respect user autonomy, and focus on delivering genuine value will not only avoid legal trouble but will also cultivate a fiercely loyal customer base.

By making your terms clear and your cancellation process simple, you send a powerful message: we are confident enough in our product's value that we don't need to trick you into staying. That confidence is contagious. It builds brand equity, encourages positive word-of-mouth, and ultimately leads to higher lifetime value and lower, healthier churn. The era of the Roach Motel is ending. The future belongs to SaaS companies that build great products and treat their customers with respect.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

What is the FTC's 'click to cancel' rule?

The 'click to cancel' rule is a provision proposed by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) that would require companies to make it as easy for consumers to cancel a subscription as it was to sign up. If you can sign up online, you must be able to cancel online in the same number of steps, without being forced to call customer service or navigate confusing web pages.

What is ROSCA and how does it relate to the Adobe lawsuit?

ROSCA stands for the Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act. It's a U.S. federal law designed to protect consumers from deceptive online sales tactics, particularly in subscription models. The law requires businesses to clearly disclose all material terms of a transaction, obtain a customer's express informed consent before charging them, and provide a simple way to stop recurring charges. The FTC is suing Adobe for allegedly violating all three of these core principles.

What are 'dark patterns' in SaaS?

In SaaS, 'dark patterns' are user interface (UI) and user experience (UX) designs intended to mislead or trick users into actions they did not intend, such as signing up for a long-term contract, preventing them from canceling a subscription, or making it difficult to find privacy settings. Examples include hidden fees, confusing navigation to the cancellation page, and using guilt-inducing language (confirmshaming) to discourage unsubscribing.

How can my SaaS business avoid issues with FTC dark patterns enforcement?

To avoid regulatory issues, SaaS businesses should prioritize transparency and user experience. This includes: 1) Clearly and conspicuously disclosing all subscription terms, including price and contract length, before checkout. 2) Providing a simple, self-service online cancellation process that mirrors the ease of signing up. 3) Avoiding manipulative language and design that obstructs a user's ability to cancel. 4) Obtaining explicit, affirmative consent from users for all charges.